Best 308 Vs 5.56 For SHTF

.308 vs 5.56 for SHTF

When it comes to the .308 vs 5.56 debate for SHTF, there are a lot of factors to consider. Both rounds are battle proven and have been in service for decades. They are both common rifle rounds that are manufactured in the United States, which is why they are the preferred choice of survivalists. So, which round is better for you? Let’s take a closer look at the pros and cons of each round to help you decide.

First, we must acknowledge that neither one is perfect. They both have pros and cons. So, you have to make the best decision for you, based on perceived threats and possible scenarios in your neck of the woods. 308 vs 5.56

5.56×45 (or .223 Remington)

We all know that these rounds are not necessarily the exact same, but if you have a rifle chambered in 5.56, you can shoot .223 out of it (though not vice versa). The .223 Remington is a very popular choice for home defense and plinking, but it also has its fair share of drawbacks.

Pros:

  • Inexpensive
  • Easy to find
  • Low recoil
  • High velocity with a flat trajectory
  • Lighter to carry the same amount of rounds, or can carry more for the same weight
  • Unmatched in close quarters

Cons:

  • Limited range
  • Light bullet that can be deflected easily, not great for defeating cover
  • Marginally effective for taking large game
  • Doesn’t suppress quite as well

.308 Winchester (7.62×51 NATO)

.308 Winchester (7.62×51 NATO)
ammunition (bullets) and the weapon holder

The .308 Winchester is a tried and true round that has been used by the military for decades. It is also a popular choice for hunting and target shooting. The .308 has more power than the 5.56, but it also comes with some drawbacks as well. 308 Vs 5.56

Pros:

  • More powerful than the 5.56
  • Longer effective range
  • Great for taking down large game in North America
  • Can penetrate cover much better than the 5.56

Cons:

  • More expensive
  • Heavier to carry the same amount of rounds
  • More recoil
  • Prone to overpenetration

Narrowing down your choice

rifle bullet 5.56 NATO
rifle bullet 5.56 NATO

Now that we’ve looked at the pros and cons of each round, it’s time to make a decision. Both will defeat any soft body armor. They are both commonly available and easy to find. 308 Vs 5.56

If you are looking for an inexpensive, close quarters round with low recoil, the 5.56/.223 Remington is a great choice. However, if you are looking for a more powerful round with better range and penetration, a battle rifle in .308 Winchester is the way to go. Ultimately, the decision is up to you. 308 Vs 5.56

Here’s the thing about guns – they are just tools. While one may do the job just right in a specific scenario, it may make your job harder in another. Your toolbox is filled with different types of tools for different types of jobs. A screwdriver makes a poor hammer. 308 Vs 5.56

Conclusion – .308 vs 5.56 for SHTF

Assuming you can only have one,  which do you pick? It’s a hard decision, but personally I prefer the 5.56. I’ve heard all of the arguments in favor of .308. Ideally, you would have each of them, but that’s not always possible. If you can only have one, the .223/5.56 is a great all-around choice. It’s inexpensive, light to carry, has low recoil, and is still effective at close range – and let’s face it, most firefights are gonna take place at closer ranges.

Lastly, SHTF means many different things. Few of us have an idea of what SHTF would look like. Even if you have lived through SHTF in Argentina or Katrina, these were two totally different scenarios. The next one that might present itself could look completely different than that. So, while .308 might make sense for one scenario, SHTF is unpredictable. Who knows what you’ll be up against? 308 Vs 5.56

What do you think? Let us know in the comments below – and don’t forget to stock up on ammo! You can never have too much.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart